I knew that all this "Trump endorsement" was going to be a bad thing! Trump doesn't get the message from the media, and that message is "America listens
to us, not you!"

Dr Oz had good intentions, but as smart as he is, he doesn't understand the monsters that the media has created; he thinks they're good people who will vote against the destruction of the USA, but he's dead wrong.

Here's a tip that I will share with future candidates: Keep your Trumpism to yourself until after the election. Keep a distance from Trump. TDS is a real condition. Reject his endorsement, and denounce his racist & sexist personal life. Make big liberal promises and then screw those lefties over big time on election day! But will they listen to me?

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

On 09 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

I knew that all this "Trump endorsement" was going to be a bad thing!

I think we all knew that. But it took losses at the ballot box to convince
you of it.

Trump doesn't get the message from the media, and that message is
"America listens to us, not you!"

When and how was this message sent from the media to Trump?

Dr Oz had good intentions,

You know what they say about the Road to Hell...

Dr Oz had good intentions, but as smart as he is, he doesn't understand the monsters that the media has created;

So now the people who voted against your candidate of choice are "monsters?"

he thinks they're good people
who will vote against the destruction of the USA, but he's dead wrong.

Have you entertained the possibility that that's exactly what they did?

Here's a tip that I will share with future candidates: Keep your
Trumpism to yourself until after the election.

What would you suggest to a future candidate who *is* Trump?

Keep a distance from
Trump. TDS is a real condition.

Indeed it is, but not in the way that you think.

Reject his endorsement, and denounce his
racist & sexist personal life.

It's interesting that you're finally willing to admit this about Trump.

Make big liberal promises and then screw
those lefties over big time on election day!

What makes you think that conservatives will vote for "big liberal promises?"

But will they listen to me?

Probably not, because you've failed to account for the fact that in order to become candidates in a general election, politicians must first win a
primary. Trump endorsements were a blessing during the primaries.

So what you're basically asking future Republican candidates to do is to hide their true intentions because they'll lose if those intentions are known.
Nice!

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 09 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

I knew that all this "Trump endorsement" was going to be a bad thing! Trump doesn't get the message from the media, and that message is
"America listens to us, not you!"

"They're trying to blame President Trump today. And I want to tell you how shortsighted and ridiculous that is. It is pathetic. The people that are running out and saying it's Trump's fault. No, that is a lazy, pathetic,
wimpy, easy mindset." -- Marjorie Taylor Greene

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 09 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

Dr Oz had good intentions, but as smart as he is, he doesn't understand the monsters that the media has created; he thinks they're good people
who will vote against the destruction of the USA, but he's dead wrong.

"We have the worst inflation in four decades, the worst collapse in real
wages in 40 years, the worst crime wave since the 1990s, the worst border crisis in U.S. history. We have Joe Biden, who is the least popular president since Harry Truman -- since presidential polling happened -- and there
wasn't a red wave. That is a searing indictment of the Republican Party.
That is a searing indictment of the message that we have been sending to the voters. They looked at all of that and looked at the Republican alternative
and said 'no thanks.'" -- Marc Thiessen, Fox News pundit

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

I knew that all this "Trump endorsement" was going to be a bad thing!

I think we all knew that. But it took losses at the ballot box to
convince you of it.

No really, I knew it all along. I've been complaining about Trump's meddling but I've been complaining to the wrong people.

Trump doesn't get the message from the media, and that message is "America listens to us, not you!"

When and how was this message sent from the media to Trump?

It's called "taking a hint."

Dr Oz had good intentions, but as smart as he is, he doesn't understa the monsters that the media has created;

So now the people who voted against your candidate of choice are "monsters?"

They're (you're) brainwashed by shapeshifting reptilian humanoids, so correction: the real monsters are the media.

he thinks they're good people
who will vote against the destruction of the USA, but he's dead wrong

Have you entertained the possibility that that's exactly what they did?

I've entertained the possibility that the shapeshifting reptilian humanoids destroyed the previous planet in which they inhabited prior to coming here to finish this one off.

Here's a tip that I will share with future candidates: Keep your Trumpism to yourself until after the election.

What would you suggest to a future candidate who *is* Trump?

I'd vote against him in the primary.

Reject his endorsement, and denounce his
racist & sexist personal life.

It's interesting that you're finally willing to admit this about Trump.

It's a way of saying "Hail Gallaxhar."

Make big liberal promises and then screw
those lefties over big time on election day!

What makes you think that conservatives will vote for "big liberal promises?"

Then they can choose to take a handout from a Republican or a Democrat.

So what you're basically asking future Republican candidates to do is to hide their true intentions because they'll lose if those intentions are known. Nice!

Yes, that is how I want it to go down. Democrats do it all the time and people fall for it.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

Dr Oz had good intentions, but as smart as he is, he doesn't understand the monsters that the media has created; he thinks they're good people who will vote against the destruction of the USA, but he's dead wrong.

The one thing I cannot believe about that race is that there were enough
people who wanted to vote for someone who has shown, repeatedly, that he is
no longer all there. Those people can claim that a President is a
figurehead, but Congresspeople are not supposed to be.

Here's a tip that I will share with future candidates: Keep your Trumpism to yourself until after the election. Keep a distance from Trump. TDS is a real condition. Reject his endorsement, and denounce his racist & sexist personal life. Make big liberal promises and then screw those lefties over big time on election day! But will they listen to me?

Trump mocked DeSantis. DeSantis, and other Florida Republicans associated
with him, won easily. That is also telling.

BTW, while we are at it, apparently people like Stacey Abrams and Beto
O'Rourke may want to distance themselves from certain celebrities. Having
such endorsements continues to bring them no luck.


* SLMR 2.1a * "And there she was, like double-cherry pie..."
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

I knew that all this "Trump endorsement" was going to be a bad thing!

I think we all knew that. But it took losses at the ballot box to convince you of it.

Except he has claimed that Trump is irrelevant before now.

So what you're basically asking future Republican candidates to do is to hide their true intentions because they'll lose if those intentions are known. Nice!

Why not? That is what successful Democrats do.

"They're trying to blame President Trump today. And I want to tell you how shortsighted and ridiculous that is. It is pathetic. The people that are running out and saying it's Trump's fault. No, that is a lazy, pathetic, wimpy, easy mindset." -- Marjorie Taylor Greene

If a bunch of Biden-endorsed candidates lost most of their races, I am
guessing that MTG would draw a different conclusion, i.e. it would be
Biden's fault.

Trump does not carry as much weight as he thinks, or some in the press,
thinks he does.


* SLMR 2.1a * "Mmmmmmmm.....doughnuts."
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

"They're trying to blame President Trump today. And I want to tell you
how shortsighted and ridiculous that is. It is pathetic. The people that are running out and saying it's Trump's fault. No, that is a lazy, pathetic, wimpy, easy mindset." -- Marjorie Taylor Greene

The people from Marjorie's district still like Trump.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

The one thing I cannot believe about that race is that there were enough people who wanted to vote for someone who has shown, repeatedly, that he is no longer all there. Those people can claim that a President is a figurehead, but Congresspeople are not supposed to be.

He can't debate, but surely he can mimic the other leftists when they say yay or nay. They just can't start with him, that's all.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

On 09 Nov 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

I knew that all this "Trump endorsement" was going to be a bad thin

I think we all knew that. But it took losses at the ballot box to convin you of it.

Except he has claimed that Trump is irrelevant before now.

Only because Trump wasn't president anymore.

So what you're basically asking future Republican candidates to do is to their true intentions because they'll lose if those intentions are known Nice!

Why not? That is what successful Democrats do.

Examples?

"They're trying to blame President Trump today. And I want to tell you h shortsighted and ridiculous that is. It is pathetic. The people that are running out and saying it's Trump's fault. No, that is a lazy, pathetic, wimpy, easy mindset." -- Marjorie Taylor Greene

If a bunch of Biden-endorsed candidates lost most of their races, I am guessing that MTG would draw a different conclusion, i.e. it would be Biden's fault.

Of course.

But according to Trump, his unsuccessful endorsement of Oz was Melania's
fault for advising him (Trump).

Trump does not carry as much weight as he thinks, or some in the press, thinks he does.

Or, indeed, as some of his supporters think he does.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 09 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

I knew that all this "Trump endorsement" was going to be a bad t

I think we all knew that. But it took losses at the ballot box to convince you of it.

No really, I knew it all along. I've been complaining about Trump's meddling but I've been complaining to the wrong people.

Ok.

Trump doesn't get the message from the media, and that message i "America listens to us, not you!"

When and how was this message sent from the media to Trump?

It's called "taking a hint."

That's not a message.

Dr Oz had good intentions, but as smart as he is, he doesn't und the monsters that the media has created;

So now the people who voted against your candidate of choice are "monsters?"

They're (you're) brainwashed by shapeshifting reptilian humanoids, so correction: the real monsters are the media.

Ah, we're back to the reptilians, are we? I'm going to take that as a dodge.

he thinks they're good people
who will vote against the destruction of the USA, but he's dead

Have you entertained the possibility that that's exactly what they di

I've entertained the possibility that the shapeshifting reptilian humanoids destroyed the previous planet in which they inhabited prior to coming here to finish this one off.

Reptilians again. You're avoiding the question.

Here's a tip that I will share with future candidates: Keep your Trumpism to yourself until after the election.

What would you suggest to a future candidate who *is* Trump?

I'd vote against him in the primary.

And if he made it to the general election?

Reject his endorsement, and denounce his
racist & sexist personal life.

It's interesting that you're finally willing to admit this about Trum

It's a way of saying "Hail Gallaxhar."

I see. You're just not up to seriously defending your own statements today,
are you?

Make big liberal promises and then screw
those lefties over big time on election day!

What makes you think that conservatives will vote for "big liberal promises?"

Then they can choose to take a handout from a Republican or a Democrat.

And for those conservative voters who oppose handouts?

So what you're basically asking future Republican candidates to do is hide their true intentions because they'll lose if those intentions a known. Nice!

Yes, that is how I want it to go down. Democrats do it all the time and people fall for it.

Do they, though? What evidence do you have of this?

For how many consecutive elections do you think lying about one's true intentions would work?

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 09 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

"They're trying to blame President Trump today. And I want to tell yo how shortsighted and ridiculous that is. It is pathetic. The people t are running out and saying it's Trump's fault. No, that is a lazy, pathetic, wimpy, easy mindset." -- Marjorie Taylor Greene

The people from Marjorie's district still like Trump.

Apparently they also think that you have a "lazy, pathetic, wimpy, easy mindset."

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-

Dr Oz had good intentions, but as smart as he is, he doesn't understand the monsters that the media has created; he thinks they're good people
who will vote against the destruction of the USA, but he's dead wrong.

Dr. Oz was a weak candidate. So it didn't take too much Democrat cheating to pull the (clinically proven) brain-damaged Fetterman across the finish line.

So now Penn has a Senator to match the President. All they need is to elect some carrots and potatos to the House for a matched set.

Here's a tip that I will share with future candidates: Keep your
Trumpism to yourself until after the election. Keep a distance from
Trump. TDS is a real condition. Reject his endorsement, and denounce
his racist & sexist personal life. Make big liberal promises and then screw those lefties over big time on election day! But will they listen
to me?

The only people that the Trump endorsement has any impact on are the TDS people. The rest of us don't care. Endorsed or not, we still look into the candidate to see if he's the right one.


... Pornography? I don't even have a pornograph!
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

The one thing I cannot believe about that race is that there were enough people who wanted to vote for someone who has shown, repeatedly, that he is no longer all there. Those people can claim that a President is a figurehead, but Congresspeople are not supposed to be.

He can't debate, but surely he can mimic the other leftists when they say yay or nay. They just can't start with him, that's all.

That would work if you are only voting for a party and not who would best represent your district and your district's concerns. Many do vote just
that way.


* SLMR 2.1a * "Get out & take your Sacagawea dollars with you!" - Moe
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

I knew that all this "Trump endorsement" was going to be a bad thi

I think we all knew that. But it took losses at the ballot box to convi
you of it.

Except he has claimed that Trump is irrelevant before now.

Only because Trump wasn't president anymore.

Sounds like a good reason to me.

But according to Trump, his unsuccessful endorsement of Oz was Melania's fault for advising him (Trump).

I bet she had nothing to do with it.

Trump does not carry as much weight as he thinks, or some in the press, thinks he does.

Or, indeed, as some of his supporters think he does.

Or Democrats who are still obsessed with him.


* SLMR 2.1a * Dental plan...Lisa needs braces...dental plan...Lisa...
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

I've entertained the possibility that the shapeshifting reptilian humanoids destroyed the previous planet in which they inhabited prior to coming here to finish this one off.

That sounds like a "Dr. Who" story, or some other Sci-Fi. Politicians are reptilian acting, in some ways, but this is pretty far out there.


* SLMR 2.1a * Arnold Layne, don't do it again!
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

On 10 Nov 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

Except he has claimed that Trump is irrelevant before now.

Only because Trump wasn't president anymore.

Sounds like a good reason to me.

Trump has remained very relevant since leaving office. Tuesday's debacle and the resultant anger at Trump confirms that.

But according to Trump, his unsuccessful endorsement of Oz was Melania's fault for advising him (Trump).

I bet she had nothing to do with it.

I'm inclined to bet that she did, but not to the extreme that he's making it out to be in his quest to deflect blame.

Trump does not carry as much weight as he thinks, or some in the pr thinks he does.

Or, indeed, as some of his supporters think he does.

Or Democrats who are still obsessed with him.

The people who voted for Trump didn't get sucked out into space and replaced with a new batch of conservatives. They were here on 1/6, and they've been
here attending his rallies ever since. Some of them are currently upset with Trump for his endorsement picks, but none of them seem upset at themselves
for having given him that power.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 10 Nov 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

I've entertained the possibility that the shapeshifting reptilian humano destroyed the previous planet in which they inhabited prior to coming he finish this one off.

That sounds like a "Dr. Who" story, or some other Sci-Fi. Politicians
are reptilian acting, in some ways, but this is pretty far out there.

Last time he went all David Ick on us, he claimed he was just messing
with us. I could be wrong, but I would expect the same from this one. I think it probable that he's doing this to avoid answering questions because he
either finds the answers uncomfortable or cannot "both-sides" the issue. So
he resorts to nonsense.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

it probable that he's doing this to avoid answering questions because he either finds the answers uncomfortable or cannot "both-sides" the issue. So he resorts to nonsense.

You asked if I thought that leftists voted for Biden to "prevent the destruction of the USA," but no way. They don't care. The media's agenda is their (leftists) agenda also, no questions asked.

Conservatives didn't know that they were voting to prevent the destruction of America either; we didn't know Biden would be so incredibly wreckless and destructive. We thought things would be sorta just fine under his "leadership" but obviously they're not.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

On 11 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

it probable that he's doing this to avoid answering questions because either finds the answers uncomfortable or cannot "both-sides" the iss So he resorts to nonsense.

You asked if I thought that leftists voted for Biden to "prevent the destruction of the USA," but no way. They don't care. The media's agenda is their (leftists) agenda also, no questions asked.

I see. And you know this how?

Conservatives didn't know that they were voting to prevent the
destruction of America either; we didn't know Biden would be so
incredibly wreckless and destructive. We thought things would be sorta just fine under his "leadership" but obviously they're not.

The closest we came to the "destruction of America" was Trump and the GOP's behaviors after Trump lost the election.

Biden's leadership is not bad. It's not spectacular, but it's not bad. He hasn't suggested that anyone drink bleach yet.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Trump does not carry as much weight as he thinks, or some in the

thinks he does.

Or, indeed, as some of his supporters think he does.

Or Democrats who are still obsessed with him.

The people who voted for Trump didn't get sucked out into space and replaced with a new batch of conservatives. They were here on 1/6, and they've been here attending his rallies ever since. Some of them are currently upset with Trump for his endorsement picks, but none of them seem upset at themselves for having given him that power.

Voting for Trump doesn't make people still happy with him now. Voting for
him in 2016 only meant they thought he was a better choice than HRC (he
was) and voting for him in 2020 only meant they thought he was a better
choice than Biden (whose mental capacity was already in question for good reason).

You seem to be equating everyone that voted for him with people who attend
the rallies yet, as I pointed out, rally size seems to have little
correlation with actual success at the polls. If they did, you'd be
bemoaning the second Trump term now, and all of the candidates he supported would have won their midterm elections.

What I am guessing is that the (sometimes) crazy candidates that Trump
endorsed in the general elections are the same ones that the DNC (and
their donors) funneled money towards during the primaries. That is
something that Psaki and others have confirmed did happen (financial
backing during the primaries) as it is something they were worried might backfire, leading to more very right-wing voices in Congress.

I even pointed this out a few weeks ago... that it might be the Democrat donors' faults if the country had swung wild-right.


* SLMR 2.1a * My grubby halo, a vapour trail in the empty air...
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Biden's leadership is not bad. It's not spectacular, but it's not bad. He hasn't suggested that anyone drink bleach yet.

Neither did Trump.

It is a good thing that Biden hasn't said anything that you might even
vaguely think was a suggestion to drink bleach or you'd no longer be with
us.


* SLMR 2.1a * Innocent critters *squashed* on the highway of life!
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

I see. And you know this how?

You're proof of it. You defend everything leftists and Democrats do. You don't care about the consquences of their actions, you just care that they remain in power.

destruction of America either; we didn't know Biden would be so incredibly wreckless and destructive. We thought things would be sort just fine under his "leadership" but obviously they're not.

The closest we came to the "destruction of America" was Trump and the GOP's behaviors after Trump lost the election.

That depends on what your definition of "destruction" is. Biden (with the help of other Soros employees) has turned our hard work, salaries, and citizenship all into a pile of "white supremacist jargon."

Biden's leadership is not bad. It's not spectacular, but it's not bad. He hasn't suggested that anyone drink bleach yet.

What's not spectacular about it? Sorry that Trump had you drink all that
bleach - he thought that people knew better.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

On 11 Nov 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

Trump does not carry as much weight as he thinks, or some in thinks he does.

Or, indeed, as some of his supporters think he does.

Or Democrats who are still obsessed with him.

The people who voted for Trump didn't get sucked out into space and repl with a new batch of conservatives. They were here on 1/6, and they've be here attending his rallies ever since. Some of them are currently upset Trump for his endorsement picks, but none of them seem upset at themselv for having given him that power.

Voting for Trump doesn't make people still happy with him now. Voting
for him in 2016 only meant they thought he was a better choice than HRC (he was) and voting for him in 2020 only meant they thought he was a better choice than Biden (whose mental capacity was already in question for good reason).

A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump.

You seem to be equating everyone that voted for him with people who
attend the rallies yet, as I pointed out, rally size seems to have little correlation with actual success at the polls. If they did, you'd be bemoaning the second Trump term now, and all of the candidates he supported would have won their midterm elections.

The only reason people have stopped voting for him now is that his candidate choices fared poorly in the midterms. Had these candidates succeeded, these
new non-Trumpers would still be Trumpers.

What I am guessing is that the (sometimes) crazy candidates that Trump endorsed in the general elections are the same ones that the DNC (and their donors) funneled money towards during the primaries. That is something that Psaki and others have confirmed did happen (financial backing during the primaries) as it is something they were worried might backfire, leading to more very right-wing voices in Congress.

That could be, and it's possible that Republicans spent money in the Democrat primaries, too.

I even pointed this out a few weeks ago... that it might be the Democrat donors' faults if the country had swung wild-right.

Perhaps. And it could have been Republican donors' fault if the country had swung wild-left. Perhaps the things that can be bought with increased
candidate funding matter less to Democrat voters than Republican voters.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 11 Nov 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

Biden's leadership is not bad. It's not spectacular, but it's not bad. H hasn't suggested that anyone drink bleach yet.

Neither did Trump.

He did suggest ingesting it. He didn't flat-out say that people should do it, but indicated that he thought it might help.

It is a good thing that Biden hasn't said anything that you might even vaguely think was a suggestion to drink bleach or you'd no longer be with us.

Nah, I don't drink bleach, but there are those who do. Google "Miracle
Mineral Supplement."

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 11 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

I see. And you know this how?

You're proof of it. You defend everything leftists and Democrats do. You don't care about the consquences of their actions, you just care that
they remain in power.

How is that proof that Democrats are trying to destroy America?

destruction of America either; we didn't know Biden would be so incredibly wreckless and destructive. We thought things would be just fine under his "leadership" but obviously they're not.

The closest we came to the "destruction of America" was Trump and the GOP's behaviors after Trump lost the election.

That depends on what your definition of "destruction" is. Biden (with
the help of other Soros employees) has turned our hard work, salaries,
and citizenship all into a pile of "white supremacist jargon."

My hard work, salary, and citizenship are not a "pile of 'white supremacist jargon'." That one speech really set you off, didn't it? If you're white, but not a white supremacist, he wasn't talking about you. But it is strange that you took it so personally, hmm?

Biden's leadership is not bad. It's not spectacular, but it's not bad hasn't suggested that anyone drink bleach yet.

What's not spectacular about it? Sorry that Trump had you drink all that bleach - he thought that people knew better.

Trump didn't have me drinking bleach -- I already knew he was an idiot and wasn't stupid enough to hang on his every word. If he thought people knew better, he obviously overestimated the intelligence of his base.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

You're proof of it. You defend everything leftists and Democrats do. don't care about the consquences of their actions, you just care that they remain in power.

How is that proof that Democrats are trying to destroy America?

They've managed to brainwash people into defending everything the media says, so now nobody believes anything unless they hear it from your cousins first.

My hard work, salary, and citizenship are not a "pile of 'white supremacist jargon'." That one speech really set you off, didn't it? If

No, it's because conservatives enjoy the rewards they get from their hard
work, but that enjoyment is ruined because our money isn't worth jack anymore. And if I say "I want things to be back to normal," then that's part of "the great southern strategy" or some idiotic thing like that.

Trump didn't have me drinking bleach -- I already knew he was an idiot
and wasn't stupid enough to hang on his every word. If he thought people knew better, he obviously overestimated the intelligence of his base.

How is that "obvious?" Was there a high volume of Trump supporters at
hospitals with bleach poisoning? And did they wear their red hats so some
idiot could tally them up?

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

You seem to be equating everyone that voted for him with people who attend the rallies yet, as I pointed out, rally size seems to have little
correlation with actual success at the polls. If they did, you'd be bemoaning the second Trump term now, and all of the candidates he supported would have won their midterm elections.

The only reason people have stopped voting for him now is that his candidate choices fared poorly in the midterms. Had these candidates succeeded, these new non-Trumpers would still be Trumpers.

They didn't vote for him at all "now" because he wasn't running. "They
didn't vote for the candidates he stumped for!" you might say, but that
would be *before* they knew those candidates were not going to fair well and, if they had voted for them, those candidates should have faired well, if what you say is true. So they must have been moving away from Trump *before*
the election.

Unless you are thinking of (but not stating) something about time travel,
which would be as far-out as the recent claims of reptile-people from
others, you seem to be contradicting yourself.

What I am guessing is that the (sometimes) crazy candidates that Trump endorsed in the general elections are the same ones that the DNC (and their donors) funneled money towards during the primaries. That is something that Psaki and others have confirmed did happen (financial backing during the primaries) as it is something they were worried might backfire, leading to more very right-wing voices in Congress.

That could be, and it's possible that Republicans spent money in the Democrat primaries, too.

That is possible, but no one has taken credit for doing so and I suspect
they needed their money for their own campaigns. When the GOP version of
Psaki starts worrying about Republicans donating to Democrat campaigns I
will start worrying about it. There does not seem to be much evidence of
that.

I even pointed this out a few weeks ago... that it might be the Democrat donors' faults if the country had swung wild-right.

Perhaps. And it could have been Republican donors' fault if the country had swung wild-left. Perhaps the things that can be bought with increased candidate funding matter less to Democrat voters than Republican voters.

Voters maybe. The big-money donors who participated in the donations that
Psaki was worried about, apparently not.


* SLMR 2.1a * "Buck McCoy?!? He was bigger than opium!"
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Biden's leadership is not bad. It's not spectacular, but it's not bad. hasn't suggested that anyone drink bleach yet.

Neither did Trump.

He did suggest ingesting it. He didn't flat-out say that people should do it, but indicated that he thought it might help.

He said it was too bad there was not something LIKE it that could be
ingested. It isn't his fault that the American education system is so
broken that some (like you) think he suggested it litterally, and that
others were dumb enough to do it.


* SLMR 2.1a * "You've stolen my soul!" - Granpa Simpson
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

No, it's because conservatives enjoy the rewards they get from their hard work, but that enjoyment is ruined because our money isn't worth jack anymore.

+1.


* SLMR 2.1a * "Television! Teacher, Mother, Secret Lover..." - Homer
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

On 12 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

You're proof of it. You defend everything leftists and Democrats don't care about the consquences of their actions, you just care they remain in power.

How is that proof that Democrats are trying to destroy America?

They've managed to brainwash people into defending everything the media says, so now nobody believes anything unless they hear it from your cousins first.

The media exists to inform the public. That's why "freedom of the press" is
in the first amendment. What the Constitution doesn't protect the press from, though, is being sued for libel.

My hard work, salary, and citizenship are not a "pile of 'white supremacist jargon'." That one speech really set you off, didn't it?

No, it's because conservatives enjoy the rewards they get from their hard work, but that enjoyment is ruined because our money isn't worth jack anymore. And if I say "I want things to be back to normal," then that's part of "the great southern strategy" or some idiotic thing like that.

I enjoy the rewards I get from working, and the inflation rate has started to turn downwards.

Trump didn't have me drinking bleach -- I already knew he was an idio and wasn't stupid enough to hang on his every word. If he thought peo knew better, he obviously overestimated the intelligence of his base.

How is that "obvious?" Was there a high volume of Trump supporters at hospitals with bleach poisoning? And did they wear their red hats so some idiot could tally them up?

There was an uptick in the number of poison center calls regarding bleach
after Trump made that statement and honestly, who else is going to believe Trump if he suggest that they drink bleach?

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 12 Nov 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

You seem to be equating everyone that voted for him with people who attend the rallies yet, as I pointed out, rally size seems to have little
correlation with actual success at the polls. If they did, you'd b bemoaning the second Trump term now, and all of the candidates he supported would have won their midterm elections.

The only reason people have stopped voting for him now is that his candi choices fared poorly in the midterms. Had these candidates succeeded, th new non-Trumpers would still be Trumpers.

They didn't vote for him at all "now" because he wasn't running. "They didn't vote for the candidates he stumped for!" you might say, but that would be *before* they knew those candidates were not going to fair well and, if they had voted for them, those candidates should have faired
well, if what you say is true. So they must have been moving away from Trump *before* the election.

Sorry, I meant that they stopped supporting him after the midterms.

Unless you are thinking of (but not stating) something about time travel, which would be as far-out as the recent claims of reptile-people from others, you seem to be contradicting yourself.

Nope, no time travel, just a wording mistake on my part. Reptilians still remain a possibility, though.

What I am guessing is that the (sometimes) crazy candidates that Tr endorsed in the general elections are the same ones that the DNC (a their donors) funneled money towards during the primaries. That is something that Psaki and others have confirmed did happen (financia backing during the primaries) as it is something they were worried backfire, leading to more very right-wing voices in Congress.

That could be, and it's possible that Republicans spent money in the Dem primaries, too.

That is possible, but no one has taken credit for doing so and I suspect they needed their money for their own campaigns. When the GOP version of Psaki starts worrying about Republicans donating to Democrat campaigns I will start worrying about it. There does not seem to be much evidence of that.

Anyone can donate to anyone they like. It's not uncommon for corporations to donate to both candidates in a race.

I even pointed this out a few weeks ago... that it might be the Dem donors' faults if the country had swung wild-right.

Perhaps. And it could have been Republican donors' fault if the country swung wild-left. Perhaps the things that can be bought with increased candidate funding matter less to Democrat voters than Republican voters.

Voters maybe. The big-money donors who participated in the donations that Psaki was worried about, apparently not.

Candidates can return donations, if they wish.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 12 Nov 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

Biden's leadership is not bad. It's not spectacular, but it's not hasn't suggested that anyone drink bleach yet.

Neither did Trump.

He did suggest ingesting it. He didn't flat-out say that people should d but indicated that he thought it might help.

He said it was too bad there was not something LIKE it that could be ingested. It isn't his fault that the American education system is so broken that some (like you) think he suggested it litterally, and that others were dumb enough to do it.

What's more "like" bleach than bleach, especially when ingestible bleach in
the form of "Miracle Mineral Supplement" is available?

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Hello Jeff,

[..]

Conservatives didn't know that they were voting to prevent the
destruction of America either; we didn't know Biden would be so
incredibly wreckless and destructive. We thought things would be

sorta

just fine under his "leadership" but obviously they're not.

The closest we came to the "destruction of America" was Trump and the GOP's
behaviors after Trump lost the election.

Biden's leadership is not bad. It's not spectacular, but it's not bad. He hasn't suggested that anyone drink bleach yet.

"It's a hoax!" ~President Donald J. Trump

Those three little words.
Said in public.
Caused 400.000+ American deaths.

For Life,
Lee

--
Show me what democracy looks like! / This is what demcracy looks like!

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

The media exists to inform the public. That's why "freedom of the press" is in the first amendment. What the Constitution doesn't protect the
press from, though, is being sued for libel.

I didn't know that they can be sued for libel. With that being said,
Republican members of government should sue them for all they're worth!

I enjoy the rewards I get from working, and the inflation rate has
started to turn downwards.

Inflation (you know this) can be measured in a lot of ways. The oil price has only come down due to Biden tapping into the strategic petroleum reserves. There's nothing heroic about that; we're less prepared for a disaster. The strategic reserves weren't allocated for "lowering gas prices ahead of an election," they're there for emergency use to keep our government functioning in case of emergency.

How is that "obvious?" Was there a high volume of Trump supporters at hospitals with bleach poisoning? And did they wear their red hats so idiot could tally them up?

There was an uptick in the number of poison center calls regarding bleach after Trump made that statement and honestly, who else is going to
believe Trump if he suggest that they drink bleach?

Uptick means "small increase." Let's see how much of that "small increase" in calls were related to bleach ingestion, and let's see if the victims were wearing their Trump hats while they chugged that stuff, before we make insane and unfounded conclusions.

If a billionaire told me to ingest bleach, and I listened, I'd sue him. Any motions filed against Trump for bleach-related injuries?

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

On 12 Nov 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

The media exists to inform the public. That's why "freedom of the pre is in the first amendment. What the Constitution doesn't protect the press from, though, is being sued for libel.

I didn't know that they can be sued for libel. With that being said, Republican members of government should sue them for all they're worth!

They could, but they don't. Why?

I enjoy the rewards I get from working, and the inflation rate has started to turn downwards.

Inflation (you know this) can be measured in a lot of ways. The oil
price has only come down due to Biden tapping into the strategic
petroleum reserves. There's nothing heroic about that; we're less
prepared for a disaster. The strategic reserves weren't allocated for "lowering gas prices ahead of an election," they're there for emergency use to keep our government functioning in case of emergency.

So this wasn't an emergency?

How is that "obvious?" Was there a high volume of Trump supporte hospitals with bleach poisoning? And did they wear their red hat idiot could tally them up?

There was an uptick in the number of poison center calls regarding bl after Trump made that statement and honestly, who else is going to believe Trump if he suggest that they drink bleach?

Uptick means "small increase." Let's see how much of that "small
increase" in calls were related to bleach ingestion, and let's see if
the victims were wearing their Trump hats while they chugged that stuff, before we make insane and unfounded conclusions.

How many of the uptick in poison control centers regarding bleach ingestion were were related to bleach ingestion? Is that the question we're asking?

If a billionaire told me to ingest bleach, and I listened, I'd sue him. Any motions filed against Trump for bleach-related injuries?

Nope, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

"It's a hoax!" ~President Donald J. Trump

He was close; the real hoax is the vaccine.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

You seem to be equating everyone that voted for him with people wh
attend the rallies yet, as I pointed out, rally size seems to have
little
correlation with actual success at the polls. If they did, you'd bemoaning the second Trump term now, and all of the candidates he supported would have won their midterm elections.

The only reason people have stopped voting for him now is that his cand
choices fared poorly in the midterms. Had these candidates succeeded, t
new non-Trumpers would still be Trumpers.

They didn't vote for him at all "now" because he wasn't running. "They didn't vote for the candidates he stumped for!" you might say, but that would be *before* they knew those candidates were not going to fair well and, if they had voted for them, those candidates should have faired well, if what you say is true. So they must have been moving away from Trump *before* the election.

Sorry, I meant that they stopped supporting him after the midterms.

But even that cannot be correct. Otherwise, his supported candidates would have won as votes are cast before/during the midterms, not after.

What happened during the midterms tells you what you need to know... they
were moving away from Trump *before* the election, and he is, and was, no longer the force you believe him to be.

Voters maybe. The big-money donors who participated in the donations that
Psaki was worried about, apparently not.

Candidates can return donations, if they wish.

They likely wanted to win and may not have realized where the money was
coming from.


* SLMR 2.1a * Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily...Emily...
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

I didn't know that they can be sued for libel. With that being said, Republican members of government should sue them for all they're worth!

Seriously? They get sued for libel (and slander) often enough that it is difficult not to know about it. They are not immune, but it does take
someone with the evidence, time, and money to do so. If they say something libelous about you, for example, do you have the money to go against them
and their money? Probably not.

If a billionaire told me to ingest bleach, and I listened, I'd sue him. Any motions filed against Trump for bleach-related injuries?

Except Trump never told them to ingest bleach. Nor did he suggest it.


* SLMR 2.1a * I open a door to an empty room...then I forget...
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Hello Aaron,

The media exists to inform the public. That's why "freedom of the

press"

is in the first amendment. What the Constitution doesn't protect the
press from, though, is being sued for libel.

I didn't know that they can be sued for libel. With that being said, Republican members of government should sue them for all they're worth!

"It's a hoax!" ~ President Donald J. Trump

That is what your orange Jesus told the world about Covid-19, causing
the deaths of over 400,000 Americans who actually believed what he said.
Should the families of the deceased sue the former president for the
bad advice he had told them, as reported by the news media? After all,
it cannot be denied he said what he said, as it was all caught live
on camera, and posted on YouTube for all to see.

We all know that no POTUS can be sued for being an idiot.

The news media reports the news, no matter how much of an idiot
a president makes himself out to be. Being a former TV reality star,
Trump knew that. And took full advantage of that fact.

Which is one of the main reasons why he lost his bid for a second
term by over 7 million votes to Joe Biden.

I enjoy the rewards I get from working, and the inflation rate has
started to turn downwards.

Inflation (you know this) can be measured in a lot of ways. The oil price has
only come down due to Biden tapping into the strategic petroleum reserves. There's nothing heroic about that; we're less prepared for a disaster. The strategic reserves weren't allocated for "lowering gas prices ahead of an election," they're there for emergency use to keep our government functioning
in case of emergency.

Thanks to Biden's handling of the economy, Democrats won election
to offices all over, retaining the Senate, maybe even the House, along
with taking governorships and state legislatures.

How is that "obvious?" Was there a high volume of Trump

supporters at

hospitals with bleach poisoning? And did they wear their red

hats so

idiot could tally them up?

There was an uptick in the number of poison center calls regarding

bleach

after Trump made that statement and honestly, who else is going to
believe Trump if he suggest that they drink bleach?

Uptick means "small increase." Let's see how much of that "small increase" in
calls were related to bleach ingestion, and let's see if the victims were wearing their Trump hats while they chugged that stuff, before we make insane
and unfounded conclusions.

It has been widely reported, the conclusions easily determined.
Some people are idiots. And when idiots listen to other idiots,
idiots do what other idiots tell them to do.

There are also idiots who do idiotic things without any prompting
from other idiots. And then there are idiots who are special cases.

If a billionaire told me to ingest bleach, and I listened, I'd sue him. Any
motions filed against Trump for bleach-related injuries?

They're dead. They thought it was all a hoax, based on what their
orange Jesus had told them -

"It's a hoax." ~Donald J. Trump

Glad you are still with us. Must have been a bad batch of bleach
that saved you.

Or maybe it was the sunlight being shown ...

For Life,
Lee

--
Hands too small! Can't build a wall!

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

Republican members of government should sue them for all they're wort

They could, but they don't. Why?

They're probably in on the hustle.

"lowering gas prices ahead of an election," they're there for emergen use to keep our government functioning in case of emergency.

So this wasn't an emergency?

The election was an emergency for Biden, because he (supposedly) was going to be impeached for his failed Afghanistan withdrawl (by Republicans in congress.)

How many of the uptick in poison control centers regarding bleach ingestion were were related to bleach ingestion? Is that the question we're asking?

How many of them wore red hats?

If a billionaire told me to ingest bleach, and I listened, I'd sue hi Any motions filed against Trump for bleach-related injuries?

Nope, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

It would be interesting to find out how many white people have been victimized by black people due to Biden's "white supremacy" rhetoric.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

Seriously? They get sued for libel (and slander) often enough that it is difficult not to know about it. They are not immune, but it does take

I heard about the Sandman guy suing CNN or something, but there've been countless (seemingly) false accusations against Republicans (by the
media) without any later news of them being sued for it. Like the Russian collusion thing; how many times have we heard the media describing him as a Russian asset?

He should sue them for each individual count of slander, but I guess good
ol' Trump just has better things to do.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

"It's a hoax!" ~ President Donald J. Trump

The virus is real but the vaccine and the origin story are hoaxes.

At least Trump was technically correct, while Joe's dead wrong about:

"If you take the vaccine then you won't get covid."

Trump explains stuff badly while Joe intentionally misleads.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)