Yes, the bare board Pi Zero W only costs $10 USD. But it would be
completely useless without adding $10 for the power supply, and $20-ish
for a microSD card. And it would still be pretty useless without some
way to interact with the device; most people use a screen, a keyboard,
and a mouse. Assuming you pay only $10 each, that's another $30, for a
grand total of $70. And that's probably a low estimate! This doesn't
even consider the continuing cost of electricity and internet access...
Those are incidental costs, and not beyond the means of the average FidoNet user. A display, keyboard, and mouse are not required for a headless setup. Presumably a FidoNet user already has a computer with which they can ssh (or telnet) into the BBS machine. The "power supply"
is an ordinary phone charger. And $20 is pretty steep for a low-end SD card. The storage requirements for a bare-bones BBS running under Linux are not that great at all.
Talk is cheap...lets see your $10 BBS.
On 16 Feb 2022, Brian Indy said the following...
Talk is cheap...lets see your $10 BBS.
I already have everything I'd need to get a BBS running on a Pi Zero W lying around. It wouldn't cost me a thing. I could also set one up on Google cloud, which would not cost me a thing.
How exactly do you propose that you "see" this BBS? How would you know either what it's running on or how much it cost me? And finally, what's
in it for me? What incentive do I have to create this?
Hot air, no substance...oh yeah anyone can be a Sysop for $10...blah blah^^^^^^
I already have everything I'd need to get a BBS running on a Pi Zero lying around. It wouldn't cost me a thing. I could also set one up on Google cloud, which would not cost me a thing.
How exactly do you propose that you "see" this BBS? How would you kno either what it's running on or how much it cost me? And finally, what in it for me? What incentive do I have to create this?
Just what I suspected...you're blowing steam out your port hole.
Hot air, no substance...oh yeah anyone can be a Sysop for $10...blah blah blah...
You could just shut up and do it,but that won't happen. HAHAHAHA...
Where's the ignore button...I saw it around here someplace.
Hot air, no substance...oh yeah anyone can be a Sysop for $10...blah^^^^^^
Even if he did set up such a thing with random parts he has lying around, he's not *anyone*. 'Anyone' includes a homeless man, a disabled person,
an elderly person, even M'biti from some tribe in Africa who has never even seen technology. None of these would necessarily have everything
else required beyond that $10 circuit board.
I say 'Crap'. *Anyone* cannot actually run a BBS with only a $10 investment.
All you have to do is say how you'll test it. But if you'd rather back down, that's fine with me, too.
The vast majority of people have access to these resources. Being homeless, disabled, or elderly does not preclude one from being a
"sysop." Being out in the boonies with no access to technology might,
but that's not who we're talking about here.
The average person in any moderately advanced country, which definitely includes Lee, has access to the equipment needed to run a BBS.
Jeff.
All you have to do is say how you'll test it. But if you'd rather bac down, that's fine with me, too.
WOW! The stones on this guy! \(@_@)/
Even when multiple people are telling you that you're being foolish, you still won't listen?
The vast majority of people have access to these resources. Being homeless, disabled, or elderly does not preclude one from being a "sysop." Being out in the boonies with no access to technology might, but that's not who we're talking about here.
The average person in any moderately advanced country, which definite includes Lee, has access to the equipment needed to run a BBS.
You seem to have no idea who we're talking about here. *ANYONE*. Not 'the vast majority'. Not 'the average person'. A-N-Y-O-N-E. For just ten
bucks, no more.
Eventually, you're going to have to give up. You're flat out wrong, and even you know it.
I can easily set up a BBS for under $10, but I'd like to know first how
it will be tested. How is that foolish?
And what's the definition of "anyone?"
Anyone: any person whatever, or (esp. in negative statements and questions) a person, but without saying which person. (American Dictionary)
I was using it in the second sense.
I'm not technically wrong, and what's more, I'm absolutely correct about the ease with which someone of average means can become a "sysop."
I can easily set up a BBS for under $10, but I'd like to know first h it will be tested. How is that foolish?
Maybe you can, probably you can't. At least, not without using resources that fall outside of that $10 budget. Irrelevant. You are clearly operating with more knowledge about these things than "anyone" or "the average person", so you do not qualify.
It is foolish to keep refusing to admit your mistake.
And what's the definition of "anyone?"
Anyone: any person whatever, or (esp. in negative statements and questions) a person, but without saying which person. (American Dictionary)
I was using it in the second sense.
No, sorry, you were not. The context and grammar of your sentence precludes that definition. Nice try, still not gonna fly.
I'm not technically wrong, and what's more, I'm absolutely correct ab the ease with which someone of average means can become a "sysop."
You are both technically and literally wrong in your original statement. Not "any person whatever" can become a SysOp for $10.
That knowledge cost me nothing.
It was not a mistake. It is entirely possible to set up a BBS on a Pi
Zero W. No rules about using pre-existing resources that most people
would have access to were made. You made those up in an attempt to
inflate the cost.
For the cost of a $10 Raspberry Pi Zero W, anyone can be a "sysop."
No, sorry, you were not. The context and grammar of your sentence precludes that definition. Nice try, still not gonna fly.
Absolutely I was. In fact the person I was referring to, but without saying which person, was Lee. That is who was being discussed at the
time.
Only if you misinterpret "anyone."
For the cost of a $10 Raspberry Pi Zero W, anyone can be a "sysop."
That knowledge cost me nothing.
Make sure you tell your teachers that.
Oh, and your boss. Since your time
literally costs nothing, why is he paying you?
It was not a mistake. It is entirely possible to set up a BBS on a Pi Zero W. No rules about using pre-existing resources that most people would have access to were made. You made those up in an attempt to inflate the cost.
For the cost of a $10 Raspberry Pi Zero W, anyone can be a "sysop."
You set the rules, right there. I only informed you of your mistake.
No, sorry, you were not. The context and grammar of your sentenc precludes that definition. Nice try, still not gonna fly.
Absolutely I was. In fact the person I was referring to, but without saying which person, was Lee. That is who was being discussed at the time.
Again, no you were not. Otherwise you wouldn't have made the argument
that "anyone" meant "the average person".
Only if you misinterpret "anyone."Pretty hard to misinterpret...
For the cost of a $10 Raspberry Pi Zero W, anyone can be a "sysop."
That knowledge cost me nothing.
Make sure you tell your teachers that.
There were no Raspberry Pis when I was in school.
Oh, and your boss. Since your time
literally costs nothing, why is he paying you?
I don't use Raspberry Pis at work.
But now you're making the claim that I should be paying myself for the time I spent setting up a Raspberry Pi? You've gone off the deep end.
It was not a mistake. It is entirely possible to set up a BBS on Zero W. No rules about using pre-existing resources that most pe would have access to were made. You made those up in an attempt inflate the cost.
For the cost of a $10 Raspberry Pi Zero W, anyone can be a "sysop.
You set the rules, right there. I only informed you of your mistake.
Only if you misinterpret "anyone." It has connotations that are different from the literal meaning.
Absolutely I was. In fact the person I was referring to, but wit saying which person, was Lee. That is who was being discussed at time.
Again, no you were not. Otherwise you wouldn't have made the argument that "anyone" meant "the average person".
I consider Lee to be an average person.
Only if you misinterpret "anyone."Pretty hard to misinterpret...
For the cost of a $10 Raspberry Pi Zero W, anyone can be a "sysop.
One would think... but here we are. Are we having fun yet?
Brian Indy wrote to Jeff Thiele <=-
Just what I suspected...you're blowing steam out your port hole.
Hot air, no substance...oh yeah anyone can be a Sysop for $10...blah
blah blah...
You could just shut up and do it,but that won't happen. HAHAHAHA...
Where's the ignore button...I saw it around here someplace.
One thing that we notice about Lefties is that they constantly poo-poo people for actually doing things - something that the Leftie is totally incapable of doing.
Remember, Lefties believe that they are in the "intellectual class". Thomas Sowell calls them "The Anointed Ones (they believe)". To them
what they do is profound and important and what everyone else does is "just grunt work that takes no brains" - but is, in reality, totally beyond their ability to do.
I run one of my other systems on a pi.
There's actually a surprising number of Pi-based BBSes online. I used to think I was being original doing this, until I joined my first FDN. =P
Being a fidonet user does not mean one could pull it off. There is a guy
who calls himself The Millionaire on DOVEnet. He is like a synchronet groupie. Knows how to post (a lot) on Vertuan, but he has yet to put his
"future" BBS online (it has been probably two years), even with offers of
free cloud hosting.
Huh. I'm familiar with The Millionaire, since he posts on fsxNet from time to time. But I was never aware of this backstory...I suppose that's because he hasn't mentioned building his own BBS recently.
Most people have government-issued photo IDs for other purposes, so have crossed those hurdles already.
Most <> All.
Fido user <> anyone. (o_O)
Most people have government-issued photo IDs for other purposes
have crossed those hurdles already.
Most <> All.
Fido user <> anyone. (o_O)
There are plenty of non-FidoNet sysops, especially in the 8-bit community.
I think we need to stiplate that in order for someone to be
running something that qualifies as "a BBS" we need to
stipulate that it is available for users.
That flies in the face of those who state that their BBS is not
available for users, and that users are obsolete anyhow.
I put my pi online as a BBS because a sysop on FSXnet, "apam," wrote a
BBS package called Magicka and had set up a pi installer for it. :)
While this discussion has been interesting, and has certainly increased the traffic levels here, I have a suggestion. If the point is to try to help people understand how little it takes to set up a BBS, it might be better if it were hashed out in a more appropriate echo.
It is not an issue to discuss it here, but I doubt most people (smart
ones anyway) who are looking for tips to set up a BBS are going to be looking in a Politics echo. :)
That said, I am not 100% sure where it would belong. Maybe the MYSTIC echo, since I think we've been talking specifically about setting up a Mystic BBS. There is also BBS Carnival, which is at least BBS related.
Has anyone who is a part of this discussion claimed that users are obsolete? I have read several Z2 sysops in other echos claiming that,
but not anyone who is in this discussion here.
Most people have government-issued photo IDs for other purpose have crossed those hurdles already.
Most <> All.
Fido user <> anyone. (o_O)
Not even virtually anyone, and not every fido user can set one up, especially on an VM.
Most people have government-issued photo IDs for other purposes
have crossed those hurdles already.
Most <> All.
Fido user <> anyone. (o_O)
There are plenty of non-FidoNet sysops, especially in the 8-bit communit
They are already sysops. We are talking people who are not, who may or may not have such skills, time, desire, etc.
I think we need to stiplate that in order for someone to be
running something that qualifies as "a BBS" we need to
stipulate that it is available for users.
That flies in the face of those who state that their BBS is not available for users, and that users are obsolete anyhow.
Has anyone who is a part of this discussion claimed that users are obsolete? I have read several Z2 sysops in other echos claiming that,
but not anyone who is in this discussion here.
There are plenty of non-FidoNet sysops, especially in the 8-bit communit
They are already sysops. We are talking people who are not, who MP<mayor may not have such skills, time, desire, etc.
If they want to badly enough, it is within reach. Otherwise there would be no "sysops" at all.
The real reason as to why there are so few sysops left in Fidonet
is because most folks who might want to become Fidonet sysops have
not been asked. Many do not even know about Fidonet. So whose fault
is that? The software is out there. Including free software.
On 18 Feb 2022, Mike Powell said the following...
I think we need to stiplate that in order for someone to be
running something that qualifies as "a BBS" we need to
stipulate that it is available for users.
That flies in the face of those who state that their BBS is not
available for users, and that users are obsolete anyhow.
Has anyone who is a part of this discussion claimed that users are
obsolete? I have read several Z2 sysops in other echos claiming that,
but not anyone who is in this discussion here.
For what it's worth, I said that users aren't necessary for someone to become a "sysop." If one goes through all of the steps of setting up and maintaining a publicly-accessible BBS, but no users log in, is one not a "sysop?" Does one only become a "sysop" when that first user logs in? Are users required for the "sysop" to "op" the "sys?"
For what it's worth, I said that users aren't necessary for someone t become a "sysop." If one goes through all of the steps of setting up maintaining a publicly-accessible BBS, but no users log in, is one no "sysop?" Does one only become a "sysop" when that first user logs in? users required for the "sysop" to "op" the "sys?"
You might want to re-read what I wrote above. I said "available for users." I did NOT say "used by users."
It is not an issue to discuss it here, but I doubt most people (smart
ones anyway) who are looking for tips to set up a BBS are going to be looking in
a Politics echo. :)
On 02-18-22 16:55, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Setting up a BBS <=-
I think we need to stiplate that in order for someone to be
running something that qualifies as "a BBS" we need to
stipulate that it is available for users.
That flies in the face of those who state that their BBS is not
available for users, and that users are obsolete anyhow.
Has anyone who is a part of this discussion claimed that users are obsolete? I have read several Z2 sysops in other echos claiming that,
but not anyone who is in this discussion here.
I put my pi online as a BBS because a sysop on FSXnet, "apam," wrote a BBS package called Magicka and had set up a pi installer for it. :)
Cool! fsxNet is my primary FDN, and I've seen some of apam's other works. I've used his guide in order to set up DOS doors on my Pi using DOSBox.
That said, I am not 100% sure where it would belong. Maybe the MYSTIC echo, since I think we've been talking specifically about setting up a Mystic BBS. There is also BBS Carnival, which is at least BBS related.
Or perhaps RBERRYPI? After all, the original boast was about creating a $10 Pi-based BBS...
To be clear, I am a Z2 SysOp. And I fully believe that users are, in fact, the *core* of a good BBS.
If someone wants to do it badly enough, they can overcome the hurdles. Isn't that what you say about voting? Except, of course, voting is a right and setting up a BBS isn't.
Just out of idle curiosity, are there any general chat echos that people actua
y use? I joined a handful of echos a week or so ago, and only 3 of those have
ad even a single message, and 2 of them are dedicated to running points, or Wi
oint specifically.
I expected there to be less traffic than when I was a Sysop in the 80s/90s, bu
I figured that there'd be at least some.
Has anyone who is a part of this discussion claimed that users are obsolete? I have read several Z2 sysops in other echos claiming that, but not anyone who is in this discussion here.
I have not heard that in this echo, but I have heard it said by
prominent Z2 "sysops" in sysop echos.
The difference is negligible. A system can be "available for users" but not "used by users."
I put my pi online as a BBS because a sysop on FSXnet, "apam," wrot BBS package called Magicka and had set up a pi installer for it. :
Cool! fsxNet is my primary FDN, and I've seen some of apam's other works I've used his guide in order to set up DOS doors on my Pi using DOSBox.
He has some pretty cool doors that will run native on the pi, too. Galactic Dynasty (similar to BRE), For Honour (similar to LORD), a
couple of slot games, and even a version of Oregon Trail.
That said, I am not 100% sure where it would belong. Maybe the MYS echo, since I think we've been talking specifically about setting u Mystic BBS. There is also BBS Carnival, which is at least BBS rela
Or perhaps RBERRYPI? After all, the original boast was about creating a Pi-based BBS...
Maybe. That one is gated to Usenet where there seem to be a lot of folks who know the Pi well. They'd probably shoot more holes into the "I can
do it with a Pi for $10" claim than we could.
To be clear, I am a Z2 SysOp. And I fully believe that users are, in fac the *core* of a good BBS.
I thought you were in Canada? And I agree. I don't have many users left from the heyday, but I am glad to have the ones I do.
If someone wants to do it badly enough, they can overcome the hurdles. I that what you say about voting? Except, of course, voting is a right and setting up a BBS isn't.
I have done both. Setting up a BBS takes more effort and skill. Surprised you cannot see that difference... no, wait, I am not.
Brian Indy wrote to Jeff Thiele <=-
Talk is cheap...lets see your $10 BBS.
Or perhaps RBERRYPI? After all, the original boast was about creating a
$10 Pi-based BBS...
Maybe. That one is gated to Usenet where there seem to be a lot of folks who know the Pi well. They'd probably shoot more holes into the "I can
do
it with a Pi for $10" claim than we could.
Brian Indy wrote to Jeff Thiele <=-
Talk is cheap...lets see your $10 BBS.
Marisa runs a Synchronet hosting company and occasionally offers free Synchronet VPSes. Doesn't get much cheaper than that.
She advertises on DOVENet.
Marisa runs a Synchronet hosting company and occasionally offers free Synchronet VPSes. Doesn't get much cheaper than that.
She advertises on DOVENet.
Man that is so awesome. How DOES she do it. She doesn't do it on a $10
Pi W does she.
That's ok...no one else does either.
Well, when you phrase it that way, I have indeed run a BBS on a $10 Pi Zero W. I'm not claiming that the other parts needed to run it fit
within a $10 budget, or that I didn't need electricity or internet service, only that the Pi Zero w lists for $10 and I have run a BBS on one.
Well, when you phrase it that way, I have indeed run a BBS on a $10 P Zero W. I'm not claiming that the other parts needed to run it fit within a $10 budget, or that I didn't need electricity or internet service, only that the Pi Zero w lists for $10 and I have run a BBS o one.
You're not claiming that...*now*...after we all proved that it would be impossible...
Well, when you phrase it that way, I have indeed run a BBS on a Zero W. I'm not claiming that the other parts needed to run it f within a $10 budget, or that I didn't need electricity or intern service, only that the Pi Zero w lists for $10 and I have run a one.
You're not claiming that...*now*...after we all proved that it would impossible...
It's not the same claim. I'm responding to Brian's claim.
It is not an issue to discuss it here, but I doubt most people (smart
ones anyway) who are looking for tips to set up a BBS are going to be
looking in a Politics echo. :)
Just out of idle curiosity, are there any general chat echos that people actually use?
I joined a handful of echos a week or so ago, and only 3 of those have had even a single message, and 2 of them are dedicated to running points, or Winpoint specifically.
I expected there to be less traffic than when I was a Sysop in the 80s/90s,
but I figured that there'd be at least some.
This echo has lots of messages, from many participants. There are
also others, such as Fidonews, which also have lots of messages and participants. And lets not forget about the Cooking echo, which has
lots of messages and participants, along with tons of recipes ...
Not all participants in Fidonet are sysops.
This echo has lots of messages, from many participants. There are
also others, such as Fidonews, which also have lots of messages and
participants. And lets not forget about the Cooking echo, which has
lots of messages and participants, along with tons of recipes ...
I really like the Cooking echo. I've gotten so many meal ideas from there!
in facTo be clear, I am a Z2 SysOp. And I fully believe that users are,
the *core* of a good BBS.
I thought you were in Canada? And I agree. I don't have many usersleft
from the heyday, but I am glad to have the ones I do.
Yes, that's correct. I was mistaken when I said I was a Z2. I fully admit my
mistake. Unlike some people, I am capable of doing that. (^_^)
The difference is negligible. A system can be "available for users" but not
"used by users."
My demarcation would be:
available = a BBS with a BBS sysop
not available = a point with a point user
Now, those users don't have to be public, though.
There used to be several BBSes that were by invitation and/or private to the
groups they supported.
But they are availble.
And that point user, if they are using BBS software, is a potential sysop for sure.
If someone wants to do it badly enough, they can overcome the hurdles.
Isn't
that what you say about voting? Except, of course, voting is a right and
setting up a BBS isn't.
I have done both. Setting up a BBS takes more effort and skill. Surprised
you cannot see that difference... no, wait, I am not.
I will definitely have to check out For Honour. LORD is one of my favorite door games, and is actually my inspiration to build my own. Thanks for the info on that!
Maybe. That one is gated to Usenet where there seem to be a lot of folks
who know the Pi well. They'd probably shoot more holes into the "I can do
it with a Pi for $10" claim than we could.
I was pulling RBERRYPI for a week. Not one single post about Pi's just a few ys talking and reminiscing about CP/M and disk structures and other stuff not lated to the Raspberry Pi. So I dropped it.
Marisa runs a Synchronet hosting company and occasionally offers free Synchronet VPSes. Doesn't get much cheaper than that.
She advertises on DOVENet.
Man that is so awesome. How DOES she do it.
Not all participants in Fidonet are sysops.
I would say that far less than 1% of Fidonet participants are sysops. Or, at least that was the case when I was a Sysop. I don't have a real feel for
the numbers now.
Sysop: | StingRay |
---|---|
Location: | Woodstock, GA |
Users: | 61 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 56:55:10 |
Calls: | 734 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 1,139 |
D/L today: |
4 files (1,291K bytes) |
Messages: | 246,550 |