There's no public information about where they went from the airport, other than PA Gov Wolf's claim that "they were just passing through."
He didn't explain if Wilkes-Barre was a connection flight, who their guardian(s) are, or whether or not their guardians would be charged
with a crime for human smuggling. He's just like "130 migrant children came to Wilkes Barre but now they're gone so case-closed!"
Just the standard Leftie talk when they get caught doing something illegal. "Nothing to see here." "It's just a right-wing conspiracy."
There's no public information about where they went from the airpor other than PA Gov Wolf's claim that "they were just passing through He didn't explain if Wilkes-Barre was a connection flight, who thei guardian(s) are, or whether or not their guardians would be charged with a crime for human smuggling. He's just like "130 migrant child came to Wilkes Barre but now they're gone so case-closed!"
Just the standard Leftie talk when they get caught doing something illeg "Nothing to see here." "It's just a right-wing conspiracy."
So I guess that would be similar to the recent findings that the Clinton campaign paid a company to hack into Trump campaign computers to help
push the Russian collusion theory?
Mike Powell wrote to ALL <=-
Just the standard Leftie talk when they get caught doing something illegal. "Nothing to see here." "It's just a right-wing conspiracy."
So I guess that would be similar to the recent findings that the
Clinton campaign paid a company to hack into Trump campaign computers
to help push the Russian collusion theory?
That does not sound at all like the modern equivalent of Watergate,
does it?
Actually, it sounds like espionage, and since one of those persons was a gov't employee at the time he was doing it to a sitting president, it
also sounds like treason.
Just the standard Leftie talk when they get caught doing something illegal.
"Nothing to see here." "It's just a right-wing conspiracy."
So I guess that would be similar to the recent findings that the
Clinton campaign paid a company to hack into Trump campaign computers
to help push the Russian collusion theory?
That does not sound at all like the modern equivalent of Watergate,
does it?
Actually, it sounds like espionage, and since one of those persons was a gov't
employee at the time he was doing it to a sitting president, it also sounds like treason.
Actually, it sounds like espionage, and since one of those persons was a gov't
employee at the time he was doing it to a sitting president, it also sou like treason.
As I have already predicted, it has been brushed off by someone here as nothing to see here. It is only espionage and treason if a Republican
or a right-wing mob does it. Otherwise, it falls under "nothing to see" or "voices (that) need to be heard" or "it was for the greater good."
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
As I have already predicted, it has been brushed off by someone here as nothing to see here. It is only espionage and treason if a Republican
or a right-wing mob does it. Otherwise, it falls under "nothing to
see" or "voices (that) need to be heard" or "it was for the greater
good."
Lefties are always "Rules for thee, but not for me." That's why they are panicing about the midterm elections. When their operatives are convicted for
the crimes that they did, those operatives will start talking and the house of
cards will fall.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
You are assuming that those operatives don't "commit suicide" by
hanging themselves, or shooting themselves in the back of the head, all while having their hands tied behind their backs.
Or be "shot and killed in a robbery" where, oddly, nothing is taken.
Sadly, I feel you may assume too much there.
illegal.Just the standard Leftie talk when they get caught doing something
"Nothing to see here." "It's just a right-wing conspiracy."
So I guess that would be similar to the recent findings that the Clinton campaign paid a company to hack into Trump campaign compute to help push the Russian collusion theory?
That does not sound at all like the modern equivalent of Watergate, does it?
Actually, it sounds like espionage, and since one of those persons was agov't
employee at the time he was doing it to a sitting president, it also sou like treason.
As I have already predicted, it has been brushed off by someone here as nothing to see here. It is only espionage and treason if a Republican
or a right-wing mob does it. Otherwise, it falls under "nothing to see" or "voices (that) need to be heard" or "it was for the greater good."
You are assuming that those operatives don't "commit suicide" by
hanging themselves, or shooting themselves in the back of the head, all while having their hands tied behind their backs.
Or be "shot and killed in a robbery" where, oddly, nothing is taken.
Sadly, I feel you may assume too much there.
Possibly. My assumption is that while a few "suicides" is chance, too many can't be passed off as "chance".
Sussmann was a former federal prosecutor, but was a lawyer working for a private firm (Perkins Coie) at the time of the alleged "hacking."
Sussmann was a former federal prosecutor, but was a lawyer working fo private firm (Perkins Coie) at the time of the alleged "hacking."
You forgot to mention that some of Perkins Coie's clients were the DNC, Hillary for America, Obama for America, funded Fusion GPS, and was
behind the creation of the Steele Dossier fraud.
On 18 Feb 2022, Al Thompson said the following...
Sussmann was a former federal prosecutor, but was a lawyer workingfo
private firm (Perkins Coie) at the time of the alleged "hacking."
You forgot to mention that some of Perkins Coie's clients were the DNC,
Hillary for America, Obama for America, funded Fusion GPS, and was
behind the creation of the Steele Dossier fraud.
All of which preceded Trump neing a "sitting president." Nice try,
though.
All of which preceded Trump neing a "sitting president." Nice try, though.
As did some of the alleged hacking. Nice try though.
You just need to admit that the only real reason that Trump one, is because the DNC rigged their system so that Hillary was thei candidate. It shoudn't surprise anyone that if a party runs the most disliked candidate in history, they will lose, even to someone as unqualified as Trump.
workingSussmann was a former federal prosecutor, but was a lawyer
fo
"hacking."private firm (Perkins Coie) at the time of the alleged
DNC,You forgot to mention that some of Perkins Coie's clients were the
Hillary for America, Obama for America, funded Fusion GPS, and was
behind the creation of the Steele Dossier fraud.
All of which preceded Trump neing a "sitting president." Nice try,
though.
As did some of the alleged hacking. Nice try though.
You just need to admit that the only real reason that Trump one, is because
the DNC rigged their system so that Hillary was thei candidate. It shoudn't surprise anyone that if a party runs the most disliked candidate in history, they will lose, even to someone as unqualified as Trump.
All of which preceded Trump neing a "sitting president." Nice try, though.
As did some of the alleged hacking. Nice try though.
Sysop: | StingRay |
---|---|
Location: | Woodstock, GA |
Users: | 62 |
Nodes: | 15 (2 / 13) |
Uptime: | 49:28:36 |
Calls: | 748 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 1,170 |
D/L today: |
2 files (1,427K bytes) |
Messages: | 247,684 |