In the 2nd GOP presidential primary debate, I only learned 1 new thing:He is full of it. It's aid from the U.S. and it's never expected to be paid back. Even if it was a loan a broken country such a Ukraine, wouldn't be able to pay back more then a Billion dollars, even in 100 years. The fighting will go on and on without Military Aircraft, A better way is peace through strength.
Tim Scott (I think it was Tim Scott) said that the Ukraine aid is a
loan, and that they have to pay it back.
Is that true? It was the 1st that I ever heard that. If Ukraine is borrowing money, why don't they borrow it from the world bank instead? I think Tim Scott is full of it.
I have heard that Ramaswamy may be something of a "Trojan Horse"Chris Christie made it more clear than ever that he's only in this to AT> trash Trump. Mike Pence's answer to everything is "I have more white AT> AT> Ramaswamy says all the right words, but nobody's gonna vote for him,
We need Trump, and if we can't have Trump, we'd better get DeSantis.
... If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choiceA choice not to decide for any GOP candidate, is a vote for Joe Biden.
Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
Tim Scott (I think it was Tim Scott) said that the Ukraine aid is a
loan, and that they have to pay it back.
Is that true? It was the 1st that I ever heard that. If Ukraine is borrowing money, why don't they borrow it from the world bank instead?
I think Tim Scott is full of it.
think Tim Scott is full of it.He is full of it. It's aid from the U.S. and it's never expected to be paid back. Even if it was a loan a broken country such a Ukraine,
... If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choiceA choice not to decide for any GOP candidate, is a vote for Joe Biden. There better not be any funny business this time around, but if they got away with it the first time, then they WILL try this again.
I think Tim Scott is full of it.
He's spinning things. Just like you don't make a loan to someone who
think Tim Scott is full of it.He is full of it. It's aid from the U.S. and it's never expected to b paid back. Even if it was a loan a broken country such a Ukraine,
That's what I thought. What does he gain by fooling people into thinking that it's "just a loan?" He's just another slimy swamp creature.
That's what I thought. What does he gain by fooling people into think that it's "just a loan?" He's just another slimy swamp creature.
They destroy to build it back up.... Hillary is dusting off the Clinton foundation to get in on some of the action...
I heard about that! The Clinton Foundation "wants to provide"
humanitarian aid to Ukrainians.
Somebody should "donate" some money to the press so that they can show
us what the humanitarian "crisis" in Ukraine really looks like.
Tim Scott (I think it was Tim Scott) said that the Ukraine aid is a loan, and at they have to pay it back.
... If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice
I was on joesbbs & he has taglines. I hate taglines, but I went with that one cause it's better than the other song lyrics that were in there.
Somebody should "donate" some money to the press so that they can show us what
he humanitarian "crisis" in Ukraine really looks like.
While I think it is technically true, there are a lot of "ifs" around that. They will only pay it back if they exist after the war is over (i.e. if Russia wins we won't get it back), if they don't go through a radical regime change in the meantime, if they manage to stay out of
some other bind that would cause the debt to be forgiven, etc.
I was on joesbbs & he has taglines. I hate taglines, but I went with tha cause it's better than the other song lyrics that were in there.
And I think that one came from me. :) That is one of my favorite Rush songs and has been in my SLMR tagline file pretty much since I started using QWK mail in the early 1990's.
Somebody should "donate" some money to the press so that they can show u what
he humanitarian "crisis" in Ukraine really looks like.
When Russia was winning, early on, they were showing it. I have not noticed it as much recently. Last I saw of it, they were reporting on Ukrainian refugees being resettled in Poland.
But my appreciation for them has conditions: If I find out that either Lifeson
r Geddy Lee have endorsed Biden, then this love affair will be over in seconds
lat. (I hold grudges against celebrities who endorse Biden.)
The media is leaving us in the dark, and there's no valid excuse for that. WWII was well-documented with rich video footage, but I swear that all I've se
But my appreciation for them has conditions: If I find out that either Lifeson
r Geddy Lee have endorsed Biden, then this love affair will be over in seconds
lat. (I hold grudges against celebrities who endorse Biden.)
Well, technically, they are Canadian so they cannot vote here (yet! :D). That of course does not stop our resident BC native from endorsing Biden any chance he gets.
The media is leaving us in the dark, and there's no valid excuse for tha WWII was well-documented with rich video footage, but I swear that all I se
It was not as well covered during the war. A lot of things that are well documented now were not released during the war for security reasons,
etc.
OTOH, the Gulf Wars were covered heavily.
While I think it is technically true, there are a lot of "ifs" around
that. They will only pay it back if they exist after the war is over
(i.e. if Russia wins we won't get it back), if they don't go through a
radical regime change in the meantime, if they manage to stay out of
some other bind that would cause the debt to be forgiven, etc.
It reminds me of a time when I loaned $40 to my unemployed alcoholic friend
who lives with his mom. How smart was it for me to loan him the money? Not very!
who lives with his mom. How smart was it for me to loan him the money very!
Cheapskate! Popeye always gave to Wimpy whatever he needed, regardless
of cost. So why should you or anyone else not do the same for others?
Yes! I remember watching that unfold on the news. But with the Ukraine war the
only focus on "Republicans want Ukrainians to die" and "Vlodimir Zelenski is a
ourageous hero movie star." There's no "Here's footage of Ukraine blowing up a
ussian military base."
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
I think Tim Scott is suffering from the side-effects of envy. He wants
in on that Ukraine money very badly. $250,000/yr doesn't cut it for
him.
He wants what Biden's got.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
I hated Rush all my life, until Alex Lifeson started appearing on
Trailer Park Boys. That's my favorite TV show of all time, so for that reason only, I warmed up to Rush.
moneywho lives with his mom. How smart was it for me to loan him the
very!
Cheapskate! Popeye always gave to Wimpy whatever he needed, LL>regardlessof cost. So why should you or anyone else not do LL>the same for others?
A loan is a loan. Charity is charity.
You really don't get it, do you? Popeye was a sailor man.
I think Tim Scott is suffering from the side-effects of envy. He wants
in on that Ukraine money very badly. $250,000/yr doesn't cut it for
him.
Now my guess is that in pass we've often "forgiven" these types of loans to NATO but I don't know that. It is also several billion dollars we could be spending here at home rather than loaning abroad. The point of arguement between the Republicans seems to be whether or not it is in
our best interest to spend money (while not sending troops) to
destabilize Russia and its military. Those who see them (and their financier, China) as a threat seem to believe it is a good investment. The others do not.
Mike Powell wrote to AARON THOMAS <=-
I have seen the source of the reference in question. Scott does claim that 90%+ of the money is in loans, but he also indicated that it is
not Ukraine that will be paying them back. They are supposedly loans
to NATO, which means there will be someone we can hold accountable for them.
Now my guess is that in pass we've often "forgiven" these types of
loans to NATO but I don't know that.
It is also several billion
dollars we could be spending here at home rather than loaning abroad.
The point of arguement between the Republicans seems to be whether or
not it is in our best interest to spend money (while not sending
troops) to destabilize Russia and its military.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
The American people seem to be under the impression that it's charity.
I don't think anyone (besides conservatives) ever wondered if the money would be paid back. What I make of this, then, is that Tim Scott is
trying to use a faulty narrative to satisfy people with his endorsement
of the "Ukraine battle." (It's a battle for our cash! lol)
The American people seem to be under the impression that it's charity. I don't think anyone (besides conservatives) ever wondered if the money would be
aid back. What I make of this, then, is that Tim Scott is trying to use a faul
narrative to satisfy people with his endorsement of the "Ukraine battle." (It
a battle for our cash! lol)
I have seen the source of the reference in question. Scott does claim that 90%+ of the money is in loans, but he also indicated that it is
not Ukraine that will be paying them back. They are supposedly loans
to NATO, which means there will be someone we can hold accountable for them.
That only works if the someone accountable still exists and has the cash to pa
the loans back. Democrats like to give loans to people who can't ever pay the
back. (Remember how they created the housing crash by forcing banks to lower the standards to get a mortgage?)
Now my guess is that in pass we've often "forgiven" these types of
loans to NATO but I don't know that.
So Biden is using NATO is yet another shell company to filter money through. Wow.
It is also several billion
dollars we could be spending here at home rather than loaning abroad.
But it's harder for the Biden Crime Family to profit that way and hide the money. Remember this is all a method for taking tax dollars out of the American Public and put them into the pockets of the Elitists.
The point of arguement between the Republicans seems to be whether or not it is in our best interest to spend money (while not sending
troops) to destabilize Russia and its military.
Any Republican who thinks it's a good idea to send ANYTHING is part of the Uniparty.
The American people seem to be under the impression that it's AT>charity.
"Charity" is always voluntary. Tax dollars are taken by force and, therefore, their use is never charity.
I don't think anyone (besides conservatives) ever wondered if AT>themoney would be paid back. What I make of this, then, is that AT>Tim Scott is trying to use a faulty narrative to satisfy people AT>with his endorsement of the "Ukraine battle." (It's a battle for AT>our cash! lol)
Probably. I wonder how much he's getting from Ukraine. And is Biden jealous of that? (Since Ukraine is a money laundermat for Biden.)
The American people seem to be under the impression that it's charity
"Charity" is always voluntary. Tax dollars are taken by force and, therefore, their use is never charity.
I don't think anyone (besides conservatives) ever wondered if the mon would be paid back. What I make of this, then, is that Tim Scott is trying to use a faulty narrative to satisfy people with his endorseme of the "Ukraine battle." (It's a battle for our cash! lol)
Probably. I wonder how much he's getting from Ukraine. And is Biden jealous of that? (Since Ukraine is a money laundermat for Biden.)
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
The assumption would be that NATO will still exist. I feel at least a little more confident that we could get some money back from them vs.
back from whatever Ukraine turns into after this.
That sentence is only a guess on my part. Your guess is also a
possible scenario for sure.
If they genuinly believe that this investment destabilizes Russia, and that this is a good thing, then maybe not. Otherwise, I agree.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Right! But that's hard for the sheep to figure out. The media is propagating support for fighting the war, and the sheep don't have any questions at all, because Jimmy Kimme already answered them all.
If they genuinly believe that this investment destabilizes Russia, and that this is a good thing, then maybe not. Otherwise, I agree.
If they genuinely believe that, they are morons.
Sysop: | StingRay |
---|---|
Location: | Woodstock, GA |
Users: | 29 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 20:11:21 |
Calls: | 591 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 359 |
Messages: | 227,480 |
Posted today: | 1 |