Hello All!
For the benefit of those who don't already know, WinPoint is now back in development. Here's a list of changes so far .....
--------------------------------
Most notable changes since 359.1
--------------------------------
Hello All!
For the benefit of those who don't already know, WinPoint is now back in development. Here's a list of changes so far .....
--------------------------------
Most notable changes since 359.1
--------------------------------
369.0 (29.10.2021)
------------------
For the benefit of those who don't already know, WinPoint is now back in
development. Here's a list of changes so far .....
--------------------------------
Most notable changes since 359.1
--------------------------------
[...]
Most excellent. I suppose this makes the "POINT Software
comparisons: PROS and CONS" chart at my https://kolico.ca/ fidonet/echos/points/ ..a bit obsolete! :D
What is the best way to proceed with an updated install?
Will the existing config values (areas, passwords, etc..) carry over?
For the benefit of those who don't already know, WinPoint is now back in
development. Here's a list of changes so far .....
--------------------------------
Most notable changes since 359.1
--------------------------------
369.0 (29.10.2021)
------------------
where is the download?
For the benefit of those who don't already know, WinPoint is now back
in development. Here's a list of changes so far .....
--------------------------------
Most notable changes since 359.1
--------------------------------
[...]
Most excellent. I suppose this makes the "POINT Software
comparisons: PROS and CONS" chart at my https://kolico.ca/
fidonet/echos/points/ ..a bit obsolete! :D
Once there's a FULL new release, yes it will.
Most excellent. I suppose this makes the "POINT Software
comparisons: PROS and CONS" chart at my https://kolico.ca/
fidonet/echos/points/ ..a bit obsolete! :D
I obviously leave it up to your good judgement as to what you do with
your "PROS and CONS" chart on your site.
I obviously leave it up to your good judgement as to what you do
with your "PROS and CONS" chart on your site.
Once a full official version is released, I am prepared to
delete the table. Or.. to update it, somehow.
Most excellent. I suppose this makes the "POINT Software
comparisons: PROS and CONS" chart at my https://kolico.ca/
fidonet/echos/points/ ..a bit obsolete! :D
I obviously leave it up to your good judgement as to what you do with
your "PROS and CONS" chart on your site.
Once a full official version is released, I am prepared to
delete the table. Or.. to update it, somehow.
I obviously leave it up to your good judgement as to what you do with
your "PROS and CONS" chart on your site.
Once a full official version is released, I am prepared to
delete the table. Or.. to update it, somehow.
The WinPoint site has been updated - the latest version is already available for download: http://www.winpoint.org/
As Tim has now pulled the old 359.1 version from his site
and replaced it with the current public beta release, most
of the WinPoint "PROS and CONS" are now obsolete, as is my
"Basic Installation Guide". I've pulled the guide from my
site..
..but whether I write a new one, remains to be seen.
I obviously leave it up to your good judgement as to what
you do with your "PROS and CONS" chart on your site.
As Tim has now pulled the old 359.1 version from his site and replaced
it with the current public beta release, most of the WinPoint "PROS and
CONS" are now obsolete, as is my "Basic Installation Guide". I've pulled
the guide from my site..
So.. should 359.1 be considered "decomissioned"? ..and never to
be used?
However, I am full supporter of avoiding programs that have operational issues and limitations that interfere with a pleasant consistent experience.
..but whether I write a new one, remains to be seen.
Isn't the install and the initial step-by-step process about the same?
I obviously leave it up to your good judgement as to what you do with
your "PROS and CONS" chart on your site.
Maybe I can simply create a link to the CONS for 359.1 to point
to a subpage or something.
Meanwhile, the main table could be populated with pending CONS for the latest version?
So.. should 359.1 be considered "decomissioned"? ..and never to
be used?
Yes, that's absolutely correct.
I obviously leave it up to your good judgement as to
what you do with your "PROS and CONS" chart on your
site.
Maybe I can simply create a link to the CONS for 359.1 to
point to a subpage or something.
Why ??
Meanwhile, the main table could be populated with pending
CONS for the latest version?
Out of the 17 "CONS", there's now only 4 which are still
valid and I can think of at least one addition to the
"PROS" :-)
Once a full official version is released, I am prepared to
delete the table. Or.. to update it, somehow.
The WinPoint site has been updated - the latest version is already available for download: http://www.winpoint.org/
So.. should 359.1 be considered "decomissioned"? ..and never to
be used?
Yes, that's absolutely correct.
What if someone comes along and wants to dabble with 359.1
According to winpoint.org, the older versions are made
available too. :(
I obviously leave it up to your good judgement as to
what you do with your "PROS and CONS" chart on your
site.
Maybe I can simply create a link to the CONS for 359.1 to
point to a subpage or something.
Why ??
'Cuz.. as long as Tim is still offering the older versions, our
combined research on the the PROS and CONS might still be
useful?
Meanwhile, the main table could be populated with pending
CONS for the latest version?
Out of the 17 "CONS", there's now only 4 which are still
valid and I can think of at least one addition to the
"PROS" :-)
Let me know which ones are which. I can start to update things
when I remember how I created that page!
What if someone comes along and wants to dabble with 359.1 According to winpoint.org, the older versions are made
available too. :(
Out of the 17 "CONS", there's now only 4 which are still
valid and I can think of at least one addition to the
"PROS" :-)
Let me know which ones are which. I can start to update things
when I remember how I created that page!
What if someone comes along and wants to dabble with 359.1 According to
winpoint.org, the older versions are made
available too. :(
I already removed anything prior to 398.2 from the web site.
And there you have it :-)
The [PROS] section also needs a bit of attention but I'll post my
thoughts in a separate message.
"[PROS]"[...]
- comprehensive codepage support
[CONS] I'm unsure about the following: --------------------------------------
- no highlighting on a search match
- editor on reply removes <CR>'s on a line by line basis; therefore ordered lists/lines/columnar text in incoming messages become reflowed paragraphs.
"[PROS]"[...]
- comprehensive codepage support
- automatically replies in the same encoding/charset used by the message being replied to.
[CONS] I'm unsure about the following:
--------------------------------------
- no highlighting on a search match
Still the case. Particularly since the search function mach have multiple matches in the same mail, this would require a mechanism to highligh multiple places in a message, that currently doesn exist.
- editor on reply removes <CR>'s on a line by line basis; therefore
ordered lists/lines/columnar text in incoming messages become reflowed
paragraphs.
This should be largely adressed by the more intelligent reflow behavior introduced recently in WP. Also, this can be disabled per area.
[snip]
The [PROS] section also needs a bit of attention but I'll post my
thoughts in a separate message.
Here we go .....
"[PROS]"
Correction:
-----------
- font size, font colours, background colours customizable in the message reader and in the message editor
Additions:
----------
- fully automatic and/or manual processing of nodelist/pointlist update files
- integrated hatch manager
- comprehensive codepage support
- support from the developer in the WINPOINT echo
Regarding codepage support, perhaps a footnote listing all supported codepages would be in order.
Currently supported codepages are: IBMPC, CP850, CP852, CP866, CP895, CP1250, CP1251, CP1252, CP10000, ISO-8859-1, ISO-8859-2, UTF-8
Here's another one for the "[PROS]" section .....
- supports IPv6
Here's another one for the "[PROS]" section .....
- supports IPv6
Yes.. I read about that one. So, it's fairly simple to implement.
Perhaps OpenXP could have that consideration too! :D
Apoint is definately one to drop for all intents and purposes, I guess.
Here's another one for the "[PROS]" section .....
- supports IPv6
Yes.. I read about that one. So, it's fairly simple to implement.
Not being a programmer, I couldn't really comment about its implementation.
- supports IPv6
Yes.. I read about that one. So, it's fairly simple to implement.
Not being a programmer, I couldn't really comment about its
implementation.
Hmmmm, from what's been going on elsewhere over the last few days, it would seem that it's far from fairly simple to implement.
- supports IPv6
Yes.. I read about that one. So, it's fairly simple to implement.
Not being a programmer, I couldn't really comment about its
implementation.
Hmmmm, from what's been going on elsewhere over the last few days, it
would seem that it's far from fairly simple to implement.
Nope, the discussion about WPs IPv6 handling is totally misleading. It works,is correct and needs no improvement. Period. Any suggestion that current state is flawed, non-standard or whatever is simply wrong. The rest of the discussion is partially even beyond academic.
Sysop: | StingRay |
---|---|
Location: | Woodstock, GA |
Users: | 29 |
Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
Uptime: | 34:18:11 |
Calls: | 591 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 359 |
Messages: | 227,760 |
Posted today: | 1 |