• From "The Encyclopedia of Witchcraft and Demonology" by Robbins / Crown / 1959

    From Gary Gordon@RICKSBBS to All on Friday, May 30, 2025 06:41:30
    From "The Encyclopedia of Witchcraft and Demonology"
    by Robbins / Crown / 1959

    BIBLE WITCHCRAFT. One of histories ironies is the justification
    of witchcraft on biblical texts, written originally for a
    religion which had no devil. Catholics and Protestants quoted
    Exodus xxii. 18, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." But
    the Hebrew word kaskagh (occuring twelve times in the Old
    Testament with various meanings) here means, as Reginald Scot
    pointed out in 1584, "poisoner," and certainly had nothing to do
    with the highly sophisticated Christian conception of a witch.
    Yet the domination of Holy Scriptures was such that these mistranslations fostered the delusion. After the execution of
    Goody Knapp at Fairfield (Kent) in 1653, a neighbor said "it was
    long before she could believe this poor woman was a witch, or
    that there were any witches, till the word of God convinced her,
    which saith, Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."
    Another text which changed the Hebrew meaning--"a woman with a
    familiar spirit" for "pythoness"-- occurred in 1 Samuel xxvii,
    the miscalled Witch of Endor.

    Writers who tried to expose the witchcraft superstition, such
    as Reginald Scot or Thomas Ady, had to clear up two fallacies:
    (1) The numerous Hebrew words, uniformly translated by veneficus
    or maleficus or witch, covered many different practitioners of
    the occult, from jugglers to astrologers. To refer to all of
    these different classes by one word (witch) was inadequate and
    erroneous. (2) The defination of witch based on the pact with
    Satan, transvection, metamorphosis, sabbat and maleficia was
    neither implied or defined anywhere in the Bible. That the Old
    Testament did not deal with witchcraft is hardly surprising, for
    witchcraft depended on a Christian demonology. Thus Sir Walter
    Scott observed:

    It cannot be said that, in any part of that sacred volume [Old
    Testament], a text occurs indicating the existance of a system
    of witchcraft, under the Jewish dispensation, in any respect
    similar to that against which the law-books of so many European
    nations have, until very lately, denounced punishment.... In the
    four Gospels, the word, under any sense, does not occur.
    (Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft)

    Lea suggested the biblical denunciations against sorcery were
    directed almost exclusively against divination.
    In fact, therefore, while it may discuss magic and occult
    customs, the Bible has nothing to do with heretical witchcraft.

    
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23