Hi Folks!

The following is my signature here on ILink:

> BarryMartin3@ <
> @MyMetronet.NET <

It's purpose is so if someone needs to contact me via alternate channel
they can. I have two 'at' signs to try to fool the nasty email-grabber
bots. (Everyone spells out 'at' so they're probably laughing their
diodes off at that lame attempt.) The address in two lines is also an
attempt to confuse the bots, using a non-traditional format.

There are two "net's" (which confuses the humans more than the bots).
The arrow thingies are just to make it look pretty.

Can anyone suggest a better option? ...I don't recall ever being
contacted because someone wanted to avoid saying it publicly in ILink.

Thanks!



> BarryMartin3@ <
> @MyMetronet.NET <

... Embrace everyone's uniqueness.
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
* RNET 2.10U: ILink: Techware BBS * Hollywood, Ca * www.techware2k.com

--- QScan/PCB v1.20a / 01-0462
* Origin: ILink: CFBBS | cfbbs.no-ip.com | 856-933-7096 (454:1/1)

BARRY MARTIN wrote:

Hi Folks!

The following is my signature here on ILink:

-> BarryMartin3@ -<
-> @MyMetronet.NET -<

Can anyone suggest a better option? ...I don't recall ever being
contacted because someone wanted to avoid saying it publicly in ILink.

I think it's fairly obvious when one copypastas that it needs doctoring
to work. Hadn't even noticed the second @. I don't get arrows, I get the
R in a circle (registered trademark symbol).

So I don't see a problem. Should suffice if needed.
* RNET 2.10U: ILink: Techware BBS * Hollywood, Ca * www.techware2k.com

--- QScan/PCB v1.20a / 01-0462
* Origin: ILink: CFBBS | cfbbs.no-ip.com | 856-933-7096 (454:1/1)

Hi Ky!

The following is my signature here on ILink:

-> BarryMartin3@ -<
-> @MyMetronet.NET -<

Can anyone suggest a better option? ...I don't recall ever being
contacted because someone wanted to avoid saying it publicly in ILink.

I think it's fairly obvious when one copypastas that it needs
doctoring to work. Hadn't even noticed the second @. I don't get
arrows, I get the R in a circle (registered trademark symbol).

The second '@' is probably like the old

Paris in the
the spring

trick: the second 'the' is usually ignored.


As for the high-ASCII characters, probably depends on the default
character coding. Here I send it out to look like a small, single-
character width '>>' on the left and '<<' on the right. Youre message returned 'T>>' and 'T<<', the 'T' being one character wide and the
arrors also a character wide. The 'T'is fine (as in thin) -- probably
more like the line drawing character.

So I don't see a problem. Should suffice if needed.

So far I'll just leave it as is. ...Sort of reminds me of a captcha I
dealt with a few years ago. Question was "Create a nonsense word using
the third letter of bedazzle and the letter that's next to itself.",
OK, so 1-2-3: that's 'd;. Now what letter is 'beside itself'?? A-b-c
... 'w'??. Try 'dw' - nope. Try 'du' - nope. Ends up was wanting 'z'!




> BarryMartin3@ <
> @MyMetronet.NET <

... Feb.20, 1792: Pres. Washington signed act creating the U.S. Post Office. --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.47
* wcECHO 4.2 = ILink: The Safe BBS * Bettendorf, IA

--- QScan/PCB v1.20a / 01-0462
* Origin: ILink: CFBBS | cfbbs.no-ip.com | 856-933-7096 (454:1/1)